SHIFTS ANALYZED
165
Shift
AVG PRODUCTION / SHIFT
306
Units
AVG REJECTION
14.04%
Overall average
Avg Downtime
228
min
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Team Deep Dive
Complete breakdown per team โ€” with strengths, weaknesses, and frequency of each pattern
โ–  Team B
๐Ÿ‘ค Omar Saif Al Sidi
๐Ÿฅ‡
Rank 1
Shifts
55
Avg Score
62
Avg Production
359
Avg Rej %
13.8%
๐Ÿ’ช Strengths
๐Ÿ“ˆ
Strong Production
359 Units
34/55
62%
๐Ÿ›ก
Reliable (Low Downtime)
71 min
47/55
85%
โš  Weaknesses
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Attendance Issues
68.8%
39/55
71%
๐Ÿ“Š
Inconsistent Performance
CV: 36.8%
โ–  Team A
๐Ÿ‘ค Ahmed Al Shizawi
๐Ÿฅˆ
Rank 2
Shifts
40
Avg Score
-79
Avg Production
242
Avg Rej %
12.6%
๐Ÿ’ช Strengths
โœจ
High Quality
12.60%
17/40
43%
๐Ÿ›ก
Reliable (Low Downtime)
108 min
29/40
73%
โš  Weaknesses
๐Ÿ“‰
Low Production
242 Units
22/40
55%
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Attendance Issues
67.3%
24/40
60%
๐Ÿ“Š
Inconsistent Performance
CV: 62.9%
โ–  Team C
๐Ÿ‘ค Al Julanda Salim Al Mama
๐Ÿฅ‰
Rank 3
Shifts
34
Avg Score
-487
Avg Production
324
Avg Rej %
14.5%
๐Ÿ’ช Strengths
๐Ÿ“ˆ
Strong Production
324 Units
18/34
53%
โš  Weaknesses
โฑ
Frequent Downtime
330 min
9/34
26%
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Attendance Issues
77.4%
22/34
65%
๐Ÿ“Š
Inconsistent Performance
CV: 41.5%
โ–  Team D
๐Ÿ‘ค Ali Nasser Al Ghafri
#4
Rank 4
Shifts
36
Avg Score
-866
Avg Production
279
Avg Rej %
14.1%
๐Ÿ’ช Strengths
No notable strengths this period
โš  Weaknesses
๐Ÿ“‰
Low Production
279 Units
17/36
47%
โฑ
Frequent Downtime
506 min
23/36
64%
๐Ÿšจ
Safety Concerns
13 high-risk
13/36
36%
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Attendance Issues
73.3%
27/36
75%
๐Ÿ“Š
Inconsistent Performance
CV: 45.7%
โš–
Head-to-Head Matrix
Metric-by-metric comparison โ€” best (โญ) vs worst (โš ) highlighted
Metric Team A
Ahmed Al Shizawi
Team B
Omar Saif Al Sidi
Team C
Al Julanda Salim Al Mama
Team D
Ali Nasser Al Ghafri
Shifts 40 55 34 36
Avg Production 242 โš  359 โญ 324 279
AVG REJECTION 12.60% โญ 13.76% 14.49% โš  14.08%
Avg Downtime 108 min 71 min โญ 330 min 506 min โš 
Avg Attendance 67.26% โš  68.84% 77.39% โญ 73.30%
Machine Utilization 82.92% 91.04% โญ 80.39% โš  84.17%
Total High-Risk Obs 1 โญ 8 5 13 โš 
Consistency (CV%) 62.90% โš  36.82% โญ 41.50% 45.70%
Avg Score -79 62 โญ -487 -866 โš 
๐Ÿ“Š
Pattern Frequency
How often each team hits these patterns โ€” X out of Y shifts
Pattern Team A Team B Team C Team D
๐Ÿ“ˆ Strong Production Shift
30%
12/40
62%
34/55
53%
18/34
47%
17/36
๐Ÿ“‰ Weak Production Shift
55%
22/40
25%
14/55
35%
12/34
47%
17/36
โœจ High Quality Shift
43%
17/40
44%
24/55
35%
12/34
47%
17/36
โš  Quality Problem Shift
33%
13/40
22%
12/55
41%
14/34
22%
8/36
๐Ÿ›ก Reliable Shift
73%
29/40
85%
47/55
65%
22/34
31%
11/36
โฑ Downtime-Heavy Shift
18%
7/40
11%
6/55
26%
9/34
64%
23/36
โœ… Safe Shift
98%
39/40
91%
50/55
85%
29/34
64%
23/36
๐Ÿšจ Risk Incident Shift
3%
1/40
9%
5/55
15%
5/34
36%
13/36
๐Ÿ”ง
Recurring Problem Machines
Machines that broke down 2+ times in this period
Team M/C Breakdown Count Total Downtime Avg Downtime/Incident
Team C LDPC8 3 ร— 2,060 min 687 min
Team C sprue drlling 1 3 ร— 1,760 min 587 min
Team C LDPC6 3 ร— 315 min 105 min
Team D LPH 1 2 ร— 1,440 min 720 min
Team D HT/Casting lifter 2 ร— 1,440 min 720 min
Team C LDPC17 2 ร— 1,440 min 720 min
Team D LPH 2 ร— 1,440 min 720 min
Team D Melting Forklift 2 ร— 1,440 min 720 min
Team D LPDC17 2 ร— 1,350 min 675 min
Team D Forklift D2 2 ร— 720 min 360 min
Team C lpdc17 2 ร— 720 min 360 min
Team C HA furnace 2 ร— 720 min 360 min
Team D SWM1 2 ร— 660 min 330 min
Team D LPDC 4 2 ร— 570 min 285 min
Team D Deflashing #2 2 ร— 510 min 255 min
๐Ÿ›ก
Common Safety Themes
Recurring keywords in safety observations
Theme/Keyword Count High Risk Count
Leak 22 ๐Ÿ”ด 4
Damage 15 ๐Ÿ”ด 4
Floor 12 ๐Ÿ”ด 2
Wire 9 โ€”
Safety 9 โ€”
Dust 8 โ€”
Trip 3 ๐Ÿ”ด 1
Oil 3 โ€”
Report generated at: 2026-11-03 00:15 ยท Oman Time