๐ŸŽฏ Team Analytics Report

Strengths, weaknesses, and pattern frequencies per team โ€” Last 30 Days (2026-10-04 โ†’ 2026-11-02)

๐Ÿ“Š Weekly Report New Report
Analysis Period: Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 90 Days All Time
SHIFTS ANALYZED
7
Shift
AVG PRODUCTION / SHIFT
106
Units
AVG REJECTION
18.95%
Overall average
Avg Downtime
574
min
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Team Deep Dive
Complete breakdown per team โ€” with strengths, weaknesses, and frequency of each pattern
โ–  Team D
๐Ÿ‘ค Ali Nasser Al Ghafri
๐Ÿฅ‡
Rank 1
Shifts
1
Avg Score
106
Avg Production
193
Avg Rej %
15.0%
๐Ÿ’ช Strengths
๐Ÿ“ˆ
Strong Production
193 Units
1/1
100%
โœจ
High Quality
15.03%
1/1
100%
๐Ÿ›ก
Reliable (Low Downtime)
0 min
1/1
100%
โœ…
Excellent Safety Record
0 high-risk
1/1
100%
โš  Weaknesses
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Attendance Issues
68.4%
1/1
100%
โ–  Team B
๐Ÿ‘ค Omar Saif Al Sidi
๐Ÿฅˆ
Rank 2
No data available for this period
โ–  Team A
๐Ÿ‘ค Ahmed Al Shizawi
๐Ÿฅ‰
Rank 3
Shifts
4
Avg Score
-886
Avg Production
80
Avg Rej %
9.6%
๐Ÿ’ช Strengths
โœจ
High Quality
9.63%
2/4
50%
โœ…
Excellent Safety Record
0 high-risk
4/4
100%
โš  Weaknesses
๐Ÿ“‰
Low Production
80 Units
3/4
75%
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Attendance Issues
78.6%
2/4
50%
โ–  Team C
๐Ÿ‘ค Al Julanda Salim Al Mama
#4
Rank 4
Shifts
2
Avg Score
-2,191
Avg Production
115
Avg Rej %
27.8%
๐Ÿ’ช Strengths
๐Ÿ“ˆ
Strong Production
115 Units
2/2
100%
โš  Weaknesses
โš 
Quality Issues
27.83%
2/2
100%
โฑ
Frequent Downtime
1,080 min
2/2
100%
๐Ÿšจ
Safety Concerns
2 high-risk
2/2
100%
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Attendance Issues
70.6%
2/2
100%
โš–
Head-to-Head Matrix
Metric-by-metric comparison โ€” best (โญ) vs worst (โš ) highlighted
Metric Team A
Ahmed Al Shizawi
Team B
Omar Saif Al Sidi
Team C
Al Julanda Salim Al Mama
Team D
Ali Nasser Al Ghafri
Shifts 4 0 2 1
Avg Production 80 0 โš  115 193 โญ
AVG REJECTION 9.63% 0.00% โญ 27.83% โš  15.03%
Avg Downtime 465 min 0 min โญ 1,080 min โš  0 min โญ
Avg Attendance 78.61% โญ 0.00% โš  70.59% 68.42%
Machine Utilization 50.00% 0.00% โš  0.00% โš  100.00% โญ
Total High-Risk Obs 0 โญ 0 โญ 2 โš  0 โญ
Consistency (CV%) 85.14% โš  0.00% โญ 0.00% โญ 0.00% โญ
Avg Score -886 0 -2,191 โš  106 โญ
๐Ÿ“Š
Pattern Frequency
How often each team hits these patterns โ€” X out of Y shifts
Pattern Team A Team B Team C Team D
๐Ÿ“ˆ Strong Production Shift
25%
1/4
โ€”
100%
2/2
100%
1/1
๐Ÿ“‰ Weak Production Shift
75%
3/4
โ€”
0%
0/2
0%
0/1
โœจ High Quality Shift
50%
2/4
โ€”
0%
0/2
100%
1/1
โš  Quality Problem Shift
0%
0/4
โ€”
100%
2/2
0%
0/1
๐Ÿ›ก Reliable Shift
75%
3/4
โ€”
0%
0/2
100%
1/1
โฑ Downtime-Heavy Shift
25%
1/4
โ€”
100%
2/2
0%
0/1
โœ… Safe Shift
100%
4/4
โ€”
0%
0/2
100%
1/1
๐Ÿšจ Risk Incident Shift
0%
0/4
โ€”
100%
2/2
0%
0/1
๐Ÿ”ง
Recurring Problem Machines
Machines that broke down 2+ times in this period
Team M/C Breakdown Count Total Downtime Avg Downtime/Incident
Team C sprue drlling 1 2 ร— 1,440 min 720 min
Team C HA furnace 2 ร— 720 min 360 min
๐Ÿ›ก
Common Safety Themes
Recurring keywords in safety observations
Theme/Keyword Count High Risk Count
Leak 2 ๐Ÿ”ด 2
Report generated at: 2026-11-03 00:12 ยท Oman Time