🧭 Follow-Up Recommendations

Which team needs attention, in which area, and with whom — with the evidence behind each finding

🔍 KPI Analysis
🏠 Overview ›👤 Mohammed Khamis Al Risi
RUNS ANALYSED
20
1,481 Units
ACTUAL REJECTION
3.8%
their own output
EXPECTED REJECTION
5.9%
for their model mix
GAP VS EXPECTED
-2.1
percentage points
🧭
Assessment
Compared like-for-like against the models they were assigned
🟢 Performing above expectation. Mohammed Khamis Al Risi comes in 2.1 points BELOW the rejection expected for their model mix. Worth understanding what they do differently and sharing it with the rest of the crew.
⚖ Rejection here is measured against the models this person was actually assigned, not a plant-wide average. Someone given harder models should not appear worse for running them. Figures cover a single import period and reflect output only — they do not capture experience, shift conditions, or workload.
🧩
Models Run
Their result on each model against everyone else's result on the same model
ModelMachine Runs TOTAL PRODUCTION Their Rejection Model Baseline DifferenceOEE
Style 640-17 5H 7 676 3.7% 5.0% -1.3 84%
R62 ET- 45-52 4 260 3.5% 7.0% -3.5 73%
R69-18 ET-25-35 2 169 2.4% 3.9% -1.6 88%
SMX201X-22 2 93 1.1% 9.5% -8.5 60%
BORO112-18 1 76 11.8% 11.0% +0.8 89%
666-18 5H 1 72 4.2% 6.6% -2.4 85%
444-18 4H 1 67 3.0% 4.3% -1.3 69%
CV98-20 1 37 0.0% 6.5% -6.5 57%
777-18 5H 1 31 9.7% 5.0% +4.7 71%
🏭
Machines Operated
Where they worked, and how each machine performed
M/C No.Machine Runs TOTAL PRODUCTIONRejection % Total DowntimeOEE
16 5 291 4.1% 180 min 73%
4 4 354 3.7% 190 min 79%
14 4 262 1.9% 30 min 74%
7 4 374 6.1% 190 min 87%
15 2 109 2.8% 90 min 71%
6 1 91 0.0% 60 min 81%
⏱
Downtime by Reason
Downtime recorded during their runs
ReasonMinutesShare of Downtime
Metal Pouring & Dross Cleaning 240 min 32.4
Trouble Shooting 180 min 24.3
Over Cycle Time 160 min 21.6
Rework systemic 110 min 14.9
Elec 50 min 6.8