Follow-Up Recommendations

🏠 Overview

RUNS ANALYSED

286

19,077 Units

PLANT REJECTION

6.76%

All Teams

Total Downtime

13,800

48 min/run

OEE

69.7%

A 95% · P 91% · Q 79%

🏭 Plant-Wide Issues (not any one team)

These causes appear in the top three for every team, so they are not down to a single supervisor. They are excluded from the team findings below to keep those fair.

Rework 4,120 min · 30%

💡 Address these at plant level — process, maintenance policy, or material supply — rather than through individual team follow-up.

🧭

Teams Ranked by Follow-Up Need

Highest score first. Score = sum of finding severities (High 3, Medium 2, Low 1)

Areas: ⏱ Downtime ✨ Quality 📉 OEE 🏭 Machines 👤 Operators

Top finding: Downtime above plant average

                            70 min/run vs 48                        

Open full diagnosis ›

Areas: ⏱ Downtime 👤 Operators ✨ Quality 📉 OEE 🏭 Machines

Top finding: Downtime cause concentrated in this team

                            Elec & Mech — 390 min (100% of plant total)                        

Open full diagnosis ›

Areas: ⏱ Downtime 🏭 Machines

Top finding: Downtime cause concentrated in this team

                            Over Cycle Time — 310 min (51% of plant total)                        

Open full diagnosis ›

Open full diagnosis ›

⚖ Method: Findings are only raised with enough evidence behind them: at least 10 runs for a team, 6 runs and 250 units for an operator, and 4 runs per side when comparing teams on the same machine. Causes present across every team are reported as plant-wide instead of being charged to any one crew.

🧭 Follow-Up Recommendations